You know what I’m wondering just now after reading
Worst CSS file ever Why would people want to crunch their CSS file in an era when people are switching really fast to broadband internet? Sure there are still 56k modem users in a lot of countries, but most of them are switching on a steady pace to broadband. I mean if you have a big site I understand but if you write your CSS in an usable way I hardly doubt it will be necessary to crunch the CSS codes.
Myself for example; my CSS is pretty long considering my simple layout but I have no problem loading this site on a 56k connection. I’ll have to look for a way to test how much it takes to load different sizes of CSS files.
In June I tried coding my own navigation bar done only with CSS. You can view a little
example of a my attemp. Yesterday I spent the whole day hacking around with
Suckerfish Dropdowns modding it here and there and adding some design to it. And
I ended up trying out some pseudo classes, which I’ve never done before except the a:hover.
Having learned about the possibilities of pseudo classes I changed my failed attemp to a better
CSS navigation This one works fine in Mozilla and
IE with
the exception that the last border is open in IE due
that it doesn’t support the last child pseudo class.
When I’m in the mood again I’ll make an alternate CSS for my website and I’ll make use of some of the pseudo classes to reach some nice effects. Than I’ll have a non IE version of my design 
